<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Sac Women</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.sacramentoexecutive.com,2008:/sacwomen//4</id>
   <updated>2008-10-13T03:51:53Z</updated>
   <subtitle>Amplifying Our Voices</subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.33</generator>

<entry>
   <title>Another Bonus For Planned Parenthood</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/2008/10/another_bonus_for_planned_pare_1.html" />
   <id>tag:www.sacramentoexecutive.com,2008:/sacwomen//4.1568</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-13T03:46:23Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-13T03:51:53Z</updated>
   
   <summary>A week or so ago, I blogged about a funding bonus for Planned Parenthood. And now, here&apos;s another. Quite the fundraising year for Planned Parenthood. Thank you Sarah Palin and John McCain. While other liberal musicians have taken to publicly...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Gillian Parrillo</name>
      <uri>http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/index.xml</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Political" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/">
      <![CDATA[A week or so ago, I blogged about <a href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/2008/10/planned_parenthood_has_sarah_p.html" target='blank'>a funding bonus </a>for Planned Parenthood. And now, here's another.  Quite the fundraising year for Planned Parenthood.  Thank you Sarah Palin and John McCain.  

While other liberal musicians have taken to publicly whining about the McCain campaign using their songs at rallies, the songwriter behind Martina McBride’s “Independence Day” — which conservative radio host Sean Hannity uses as his radio program’s theme song — has decided to take royalties from the song to donate fund abortion provider Planned Parenthood in the Arizona senator’s name.


Gillian Parrillo
SacWomen.com

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Don&apos;t Deny These Guys A Family</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/2008/10/dont_deny_these_guys_a_family_1.html" />
   <id>tag:www.sacramentoexecutive.com,2008:/sacwomen//4.1565</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-12T00:29:48Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-12T00:38:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Vote No on Proposition 8. And send money too. I did and I don&apos;t even live in California, but I am an American citizen who cares about civil liberties! This is an important issue for all citizens, straight or...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Gillian Parrillo</name>
      <uri>http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/index.xml</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Political" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/">
      <![CDATA[<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UtUlJel4RR8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UtUlJel4RR8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Vote No on Proposition 8.  And <a href="https://secure.ga4.org/01/equalityforall" target='b lank'>send money </a>too.  I did and I don't even live in California, but I am an American citizen who cares about civil liberties!  This is an important issue for all citizens, straight or gay, if you care about protecting the rights of individuals in marriage and many other things too!

Gillian Parrillo
SacWomen.com]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Military Wives For Obama</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/2008/10/military_wives_for_obama.html" />
   <id>tag:www.sacramentoexecutive.com,2008:/sacwomen//4.1564</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-11T00:13:03Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-11T00:14:25Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Gillian Parrillo SacWomen.com...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Gillian Parrillo</name>
      <uri>http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/index.xml</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Political" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/">
      <![CDATA[<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vwk4LL5-Mpo&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vwk4LL5-Mpo&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Gillian Parrillo
SacWomen.com]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Can You Be ProLife and Support Barack Obama?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/2008/10/can_you_be_prolife_and_support.html" />
   <id>tag:www.sacramentoexecutive.com,2008:/sacwomen//4.1562</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-10T23:56:24Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-10T23:58:39Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The answer is most definitely YES. Check out ProLifeObama Gillian Parrillo SacWomen.com...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Gillian Parrillo</name>
      <uri>http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/index.xml</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Political" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/">
      <![CDATA[The answer is most definitely YES.
Check out <a href="http://prolifeproobama.com/" target='blank'>ProLifeObama</a>

Gillian Parrillo
SacWomen.com]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Where Obama Stands On Women&apos;s Issues</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/2008/10/where_obama_stands_on_womens_i.html" />
   <id>tag:www.sacramentoexecutive.com,2008:/sacwomen//4.1560</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-09T21:05:01Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-09T21:07:33Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Please review this analysis by the National Organization for Women PAC. And then spread the news to all of the women you know. Gillian Parrillo SacWomen.com...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Gillian Parrillo</name>
      <uri>http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/index.xml</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Political" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/">
      <![CDATA[Please review this <a href="http://www.nowpacs.org/2008/obama/issues.html" target='blank'>analysis</a> by the National Organization for Women PAC.  And then spread the news to all of the women you know.

Gillian Parrillo
SacWomen.com]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The Female Face of the Republican Party</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/2008/10/the_female_face_of_the_republi.html" />
   <id>tag:www.sacramentoexecutive.com,2008:/sacwomen//4.1555</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-05T16:37:37Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-05T16:40:24Z</updated>
   
   <summary>From Andrew Sullivan&apos;s blog, a comment from one of his female readers: Really any woman who considers herself a conservative or identifies with the Republican party should be embarrassed by Sarah Palin. Seriously, this is the female face of the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Gillian Parrillo</name>
      <uri>http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/index.xml</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Political" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/">
      <![CDATA[From <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/" target='blank'>Andrew Sullivan's blog</a>, a comment from one of his female readers:

<blockquote>Really any woman who considers herself a conservative or identifies with the Republican party should be embarrassed by Sarah Palin.  Seriously, this is the female face of the party.  The debate was a joke, setting the bar so low that as long as she didn't drool all over herself it's considered a victory.  That is what Republican women should be proud of?  Her winking and talking "folksy", you betcha goshdarnit, that's the way the party wants to represent itself to the country and the world?

The fact that so many other qualified women in the party, like Olympia Snowe (whom I admire greatly), Kay Baily Hutchinson, Christie Todd Whitman (my former governor) are able to communicate and connect with the American people, were passed over for this disaster of a candidate,  is greatly disheartening to me as a young woman.  Say what you want about Hillary Clinton, but she didn't ask to be treated differently. She was able to take on the big boys and even throw some elbows, too.  I just can't believe this is the example that the Republicans want to set for the future and for young women especially. </blockquote>

Gillian Parrillo
SacWomen]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>A Message From The Queen</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/2008/10/a_message_from_the_queen.html" />
   <id>tag:www.sacramentoexecutive.com,2008:/sacwomen//4.1553</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-02T14:23:53Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-02T14:24:58Z</updated>
   
   <summary>A Message from the Queen To the citizens of the United States of America from Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II In light of your failure in recent years to nominate competent candidates for President of the USA and thus...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Gillian Parrillo</name>
      <uri>http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/index.xml</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Political" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/">
      <![CDATA[<blockquote>A Message from the Queen

To the citizens of the United States of America from Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II

In light of your failure in recent years to nominate competent candidates for President of the USA and thus to govern yourselves, we hereby give notice of the revocation of your independence, effective immediately. (You should look up 'revocation' in the Oxford English Dictionary.)

Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will resume monarchical duties over all states, commonwealths, and territories (except Alaska, which she does not fancy).

Your new Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, will appoint a Governor for America without the need for further elections.

Congress and the Senate will be disbanded. A questionnaire may be circulated next year to determine whether any of you noticed.

To aid in the transition to a British Crown dependency, the following rules are introduced with immediate effect:

-----------------------
1. The letter 'U' will be reinstated in words such as 'colour,'favour,'
'labour' and 'neighbour.' Likewise, you will learn to spell 'doughnut'
without skipping half the letters, and the suffix '-ize' will be replaced by the suffix '-'ise.' Generally, you will be expected to raise your vocabulary to acceptable levels. (look up 'vocabulary').
------------------------
2. Using the same twenty-seven words interspersed with filler noises such as ''like' and 'you know' is an unacceptable and inefficient form of communication. There is no such thing as U.S .English. We will let Microsoft know on your behalf. The Microsoft spell-checker will be adjusted to take into account the reinstated letter 'u'' and the elimination of '-ize.'
-------------------
3. July 4th will no longer be celebrated as a holiday.
-----------------
4.You will learn to resolve personal issues without using guns, lawyers, or therapists. The fact that you need so many lawyers and therapists shows that you're not quite ready to be independent. Guns should only be used for shooting grouse. If you can't sort things out without suing someone or speaking to a therapist, then you're not ready to shoot grouse.
----------------------
5. Therefore, you will no longer be allowed to own or carry anything more dangerous than a vegetable peeler. Although a permit will be required if you wish to carry a vegetable peeler in public.
----------------------
6. All intersections will be replaced with roundabouts, and you will start driving on the left side with immediate effect. At the same time, you will go metric with immediate effect and without the benefit of conversion tables. Both roundabouts and metrication will help you understand the British sense of humour.
--------------------
7. The former USA will adopt UK prices on petrol (which you have been calling gasoline) of roughly $10/US gallon. Get used to it.
-------------------
8. You will learn to make real chips. Those things you call French fries are not real chips, and those things you insist on calling potato chips are properly called crisps. Real chips are thick cut, fried in animal fat, and dressed not with catsup but with vinegar.
-------------------
9. The cold, tasteless stuff you insist on calling beer is not actually beer at all. Henceforth, only proper British Bitter will be referred to as beer, and European brews of known and accepted provenance will be referred to as Lager. South African beer is also acceptable, as they are pound for pound the greatest sporting nation on earth and it can only be due to the beer.  They are also part of the British Commonwealth - see what it did for them. American brands will be referred to as Near-Frozen Gnat's Urine, so that all can be sold without risk of further confusion.
---------------------
10. Hollywood will be required occasionally to cast English actors as good guys. Hollywood will also be required to cast English actors to play English characters. Watching Andie Macdowell attempt English dialogue in Four Weddings and a Funeral was an experience akin to having one's ears removed with a cheese grater.
---------------------
11. You will cease playing American football. There is only one kind of proper football; you call it soccer. Those of you brave enough will, in time, be allowed to play rugby (which has some similarities to American football, but does not involve stopping for a rest every twenty seconds or wearing full kevlar body armour like a bunch of nancies).
---------------------
12. Further, you will stop playing baseball. It is not reasonable to host an event called the World Series for a game which is not played outside of America . Since only 2.1% of you are aware there is a world beyond your borders, your error is understandable. You will learn cricket, and we will let you face the South Africans first to take the sting out of their deliveries.
--------------------
13. You must tell us who killed JFK. It's been driving us mad.
-----------------
14. An internal revenue agent (i.e. tax collector) from Her Majesty's Government will be with you shortly to ensure the acquisition of all monies due (backdated to 1776).
---------------
15. Daily Tea Time begins promptly at 4 p.m. with proper cups, with saucers, and never mugs, with high quality biscuits (cookies) and cakes; plus strawberries (with cream) when in season.

God Save the Queen!</blockquote>

-- 
Eileen Rosenthal
Graphic Design
39 Cliffwood St.
Lenox, MA 01240
413.637.1879
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Planned Parenthood Has Sarah Palin To Thank</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/2008/10/planned_parenthood_has_sarah_p.html" />
   <id>tag:www.sacramentoexecutive.com,2008:/sacwomen//4.1552</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-01T23:56:23Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-02T00:01:25Z</updated>
   
   <summary>An e-mail urging people to donate to Planned Parenthood Federation of America &quot;in honor of Sarah Palin&quot; has generated more than 31,000 donations totaling $802,678 as of Saturday, You can join this movement by logging on to Planned Parenthood and...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Gillian Parrillo</name>
      <uri>http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/index.xml</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Political" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/">
      <![CDATA[An e-mail urging people to donate to Planned Parenthood Federation of America "in honor of Sarah Palin" has generated more than 31,000 donations totaling $802,678 as of Saturday, 

You can join this movement by logging on to Planned Parenthood and making a donation in Sarah Palin's name.  Planned Parenthood will send her a card acknowledging the gift!

Go <a href="https://secure.ga0.org/02/pp10000_inhonor" target='blank'>online</a> 
Choose to make the donation in honor of SARAH PALIN.
Send the acknowledgement card to:
McCain for President
1235 S. Clark Street
1st Floor
Arlington , VA 22202

THANKS SARAH!

Making a donation to the Obama campaign works too, but Sarah won’t get a card!!

Gillian Parrillo
SacWomen

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>A Woman&apos;s Worth - We&apos;ve Come A Long Way Baby</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/2008/10/a_womans_worth_weve_come_a_lon.html" />
   <id>tag:www.sacramentoexecutive.com,2008:/sacwomen//4.1551</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-01T23:52:18Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-01T23:54:03Z</updated>
   
   <summary>By Goldie Taylor I have been a mother all of my adult life. A single working mother. I put off dating, took menial jobs far beneath my qualifications and baked my share of ginger bread cookies for PTA Night, all...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Gillian Parrillo</name>
      <uri>http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/index.xml</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Political" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/">
      <![CDATA[By Goldie Taylor


<blockquote>I have been a mother all of my adult life.  A single working mother. I put off dating, took menial jobs far beneath my qualifications and baked my share of ginger bread cookies for PTA Night, all so that three
incredible children could have better. I chose their lives over mine.  I don't have to tell you that it wasn't easy. Unfortunately, my story, our story, is not unique.

We slept in cars, bought groceries with food stamps and prayed for a better day.  When that wasn't enough, I put myself through school at Emory University and took a part-time job as a staff writer at the Atlanta Journal Constitution.  That was over a decade ago.

Along the way, things got better. I've been an executive at two Fortune 500 companies and a practice director at two multinational public relations firms. Today, I own an advertising agency and I've authored two novels.  A third and fourth are on the way, God willing. All of this was possible because somebody laid a brick or two on the road for me.

A few weeks ago, I woke in tears.  It was my 40th birthday and certainly not a time for sadness.  Rather, I cried in joy because for the first time I realized and could embrace the value of the struggle.  The bright
little girl, who once cried in my arms because we didn't know where we were going to live, was headed off to Brown University .  The small boy who had been the "man of the house" far too soon was now truly a man.  And the tiny, angelic baby who had come to this world precious and innocent just 15 months after him was now a 16 year old girl headed out to her first job interview.

For all of this, maybe I should be proud of a woman like Sarah Palin. Maybe, just maybe, I should be rejoicing in John McCain's selected running mate.

But I'm not.

I'm not a "bed wetting liberal" nor am I a "right-wing zealot." What I am is a working mother.  And I cry foul.

I won't, for a moment, denigrate her experience or lob spit balls at her family.  I will, though, take issue with what she knows.  Or more succinctly, what she does not know.  Living in Alaska , I'm not sure how much she knows about the people living in inner city Baltimore .  I don't know how much she cares about the 125 murders this summer in Chicago .  I have no idea what she believes about HIV/ AIDS and the havoc it wrecks on Black women or the cancer rates in East St. Louis. She hasn't said nary a word about Hurricane Katrina or the infant mortality rates in Appalachia .

I do know that she's a life-time member of the NRA, a proponent of individuals who wielded the very weapons that killed my father and brother. I do know that she "lives really close to Russia ," but I'm not so certain she is ready for Putin. I know she wanted to ban books for public libraries and sex education in schools, but that her 17 year old is pregnant and preparing for a shotgun wedding.  I know that she loves her husband enough to allow him (and probably did herself) use her office to settle a personal score -- one that the McCain campaign would now like to cover in under a blanket of Juneau snow.  
 
I know that the Alaska Independent Party, and its secessionist platform, was enticing enough for her to attend its conference (and for her husband to become a card carrying member).  Does she love her country? I'm sure.  Enough to support those who want to leave it.

But I have no earthly idea what she knows (or could possibly know) about national domestic policy or foreign diplomacy.  For all of her working class values, she never once mentioned the Middle Class in her diatribe that mocked her opponent's experience. Having been the mayor of Wasilla (pop. 6,000 at the time) and governor of Alaska (a state a smaller than the county I live in) for a little over a year, she felt she was qualified to do that. And obviously, so did John McCain.

If she's qualified, then so am I.

But in this country I love, she has been afforded the ability to run.The very constitution she says doesn't apply to the men at Guantanamo says she can.  But this is about more than that.

As Gloria Steinem said in a recent Los Angeles Times editorial, "Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It's about making life more fair for women everywhere. It's not about a piece of the existing pie; there are too many of us for that. It's about baking a new pie."

The good news is thanks to Shirley Chisholm, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Angela Davis, Condoleeza Rice, Anita Hill, Madeline Albright, Maxine Waters, Kathleen Sebelius, Hilary Rodham Clinton and a slew of others, there are 18 million proverbial cracks in the ceiling. Our collective political and economic power is due to the strides (and leaps) they, and others, took on my behalf. I am grateful.  I am deeply humbled to stand on the bricks they'd laid before me.

But, whatever our struggle was (and is), the last thing I want is to be patronized.  Just as I cannot support just any African American who decides to offer themselves up for public service, I will not toss my vote to someone just because we share the same chromosome mix. To do so would dishonor the vow I made to my children, to myself. I did not vote for Al Sharpton, wasn't old enough (nor would I have) voted for Jesse Jackson and I certainly will not support Sarah Palin.  Identity politics, especially in this case, are a sham of the worst order.

When I cast my vote, it will be for people who will lay more bricks for people like me.  It will be for people who will put diplomacy before war, challenge us all to provide health care for the sick, help another child go to college, and check the special interests in Washington.
This fall, I'm not looking for a woman. I'm looking for a brick layer. I could care less if that person hasn't spent "enough" time in Washington or can "properly field dress a moose". I could care less if that person likes hockey, soccer, football or table tennis.  I could care less if they graduated from Harvard or the University of Iowa . I'm a Christian, but I could care less if they are down with Deuteronomy, Leviticus or Numbers. I want them to uphold the Constitution.

So no, I will not sit idly by as they attempt to suspend habeas corpus at Guantanamo Bay, engage wiretaps on American citizens without a warrant, and hide behind executive privilege when they are caught firing attorney generals based on how well they tow the Republican line.  I won't let them cost us $12 billion a month fighting a war that should have never been authorized and never been waged.  Not while working people lose their homes to predatory lenders and watch as we bail out the financial institutions that created the housing crisis.

I will not, in the name of history, vote for a woman like Sarah Palin who does not share my values.

But here's what I will do.

I will continue raising money for Barack Obama. I will get on the phone again and call people in distant states I've never met. I will e-mail, call, and knock on doors until the final vote is cast. I do this, not
because he shares my skin, but because I admire his principles and he shares my values. I do this because Barack Obama is more than a community organizer, he is a bricklayer. And he sees -- just as he sees
the light in Michelle's eyes -- my struggle, my worth as a woman.</blockquote>

Gillian Parrillo
SacWomen

 
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Palin Problem: She&apos;s Out Of Her League</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/2008/09/palin_problem_shes_out_of_her_league.html" />
   <id>tag:www.sacramentoexecutive.com,2008:/sacwomen//4.1549</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-26T23:35:35Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-26T23:37:22Z</updated>
   
   <summary>By Kathleen Parker If at one time women were considered heretical for swimming upstream against feminist orthodoxy, they now face condemnation for swimming downstream — away from Sarah Palin. To express reservations about her qualifications to be vice president —...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Gillian Parrillo</name>
      <uri>http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/index.xml</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Political" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/">
      <![CDATA[<blockquote>By Kathleen Parker


If at one time women were considered heretical for swimming upstream against feminist orthodoxy, they now face condemnation for swimming downstream — away from Sarah Palin.

To express reservations about her qualifications to be vice president — and possibly president — is to risk being labeled anti-woman.

Or, as I am guilty of charging her early critics, supporting only a certain kind of woman. 

Some of the passionately feminist critics of Palin who attacked her personally deserved some of the backlash they received. But circumstances have changed since Palin was introduced as just a hockey mom with lipstick — what a difference a financial crisis makes — and a more complicated picture has emerged.

As we’ve seen and heard more from John McCain’s running mate, it is increasingly clear that Palin is a problem. Quick study or not, she doesn’t know enough about economics and foreign policy to make Americans comfortable with a President Palin should conditions warrant her promotion. 

Yes, she recently met and turned several heads of state as the United Nations General Assembly convened in New York. She was gracious, charming and disarming. Men swooned. Pakistan’s president wanted to hug her. (Perhaps Osama bin Laden is dying to meet her?)

And, yes, she has common sense, something we value. And she’s had executive experience as a mayor and a governor, though of relatively small constituencies (about 6,000 and 680,000, respectively). 

Finally, Palin’s narrative is fun, inspiring and all-American in that frontier way we seem to admire. When Palin first emerged as John McCain’s running mate, I confess I was delighted. She was the antithesis and nemesis of the hirsute, Birkenstock-wearing sisterhood — a refreshing feminist of a different order who personified the modern successful working mother.

Palin didn’t make a mess cracking the glass ceiling. She simply glided through it. 

It was fun while it lasted.

Palin’s recent interviews with Charles Gibson, Sean Hannity, and now Katie Couric have all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident candidate. Who Is Clearly Out Of Her League.

No one hates saying that more than I do. Like so many women, I’ve been pulling for Palin, wishing her the best, hoping she will perform brilliantly. I’ve also noticed that I watch her interviews with the held breath of an anxious parent, my finger poised over the mute button in case it gets too painful. Unfortunately, it often does. My cringe reflex is exhausted. 

Palin filibusters. She repeats words, filling space with deadwood. Cut the verbiage and there’s not much content there. Here’s but one example of many from her interview with Hannity: “Well, there is a danger in allowing some obsessive partisanship to get into the issue that we’re talking about today. And that’s something that John McCain, too, his track record, proving that he can work both sides of the aisle, he can surpass the partisanship that must be surpassed to deal with an issue like this.”

When Couric pointed to polls showing that the financial crisis had boosted Obama’s numbers, Palin blustered wordily: “I’m not looking at poll numbers. What I think Americans at the end of the day are going to be able to go back and look at track records and see who’s more apt to be talking about solutions and wishing for and hoping for solutions for some opportunity to change, and who’s actually done it?”

If BS were currency, Palin could bail out Wall Street herself.

If Palin were a man, we’d all be guffawing, just as we do every time Joe Biden tickles the back of his throat with his toes. But because she’s a woman — and the first ever on a Republican presidential ticket — we are reluctant to say what is painfully true. 

What to do?

McCain can’t repudiate his choice for running mate. He not only risks the wrath of the GOP’s unforgiving base, but he invites others to second-guess his executive decision-making ability. Barack Obama faces the same problem with Biden. 

Only Palin can save McCain, her party, and the country she loves. She can bow out for personal reasons, perhaps because she wants to spend more time with her newborn. No one would criticize a mother who puts her family first.

Do it for your country. </blockquote>
— Kathleen Parker is a nationally syndicated columnist.

© 2008, Washington Post Writers Group

Gillian Parrillo
SacWomen.com


 
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Pay Negotiation for Women - Free Seminar</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/2008/09/pay_negotiation_for_women_free_1.html" />
   <id>tag:www.sacramentoexecutive.com,2008:/sacwomen//4.1548</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-25T16:55:46Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-25T16:59:32Z</updated>
   
   <summary>WORK$MART: Pay Negotiation for Women (Two-Part Series) Did you know that men are four times more likely to initiate salary negotiations than women? And that a worker stands to lose more than $500,000 by age 60 if she fails to...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Gillian Parrillo</name>
      <uri>http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/index.xml</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Financial" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/">
      <![CDATA[WORK$MART: Pay Negotiation for Women (Two-Part Series)
Did you know that men are four times more likely to initiate salary negotiations than women? And that a worker stands to lose more than $500,000 by age 60 if she fails to negotiate her first salary?
The National Women's Law Center can help you learn the essential nuts and bolts of effective salary negotiation through our free two-part series of online workshops: 
WORK$MART: Pay Negotiation for Women (Two-Part Series)
1:00 p.m. Eastern on Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2008, and 1:00 p.m. Eastern on Wednesday, Oct. 8, 2008
<a href="http://action.nwlc.org/worksmart" target='blank'>Register Now</a>: 
During these workshops you will learn:
•        How to benchmark the salary of your current job;
•        How to determine whether or not you are paid fairly; and
•        How to negotiate a raise or promotion.
These workshops will be moderated by Jocelyn Samuels, Vice President for Education and Employment at the National Women's Law Center. They were developed and will be led by Dr. Evelyn Murphy, President of The WAGE Project, Inc., a national grassroots activist organization dedicated to eliminating the gender wage gap. Dr. Murphy is a Ph. D. economist, former Lt. Governor of Massachusetts, and author of Getting Even: Why Women Don't Get Paid Like Men and What to Do About It.

This two-part webinar series is free to participants, but registration is required.
This webinar is part of the <a href="www.http://www.nwlc.org/educationseries." target='blank'>National Women's Law Center's Citi Education Series on Family Economic Security</a>

Gillian Parrillo
SacWomen.com]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Campbell Brown Speaks Out on Sarah Palin&apos;s Access to the Press</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/2008/09/campbell_brown_speaks_out_on_s.html" />
   <id>tag:www.sacramentoexecutive.com,2008:/sacwomen//4.1547</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-24T20:46:17Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-24T20:48:36Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Tonight I call on the McCain campaign to stop treating Sarah Palin like she is a delicate flower that will wilt at any moment. This woman is from Alaska for crying out loud. She is strong. She is tough. She...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Gillian Parrillo</name>
      <uri>http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/index.xml</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Political" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/">
      <![CDATA[<blockquote>Tonight I call on the McCain campaign to stop treating Sarah Palin like she is a delicate flower that will wilt at any moment. This woman is from Alaska for crying out loud. She is strong. She is tough. She is confident. And you claim she is ready to be one heart beat away form the presidency. If that is the case, then end this chauvinistic treatment of her now. Allow her to show her stuff. Allow her to face down those pesky reporters... Let her have a real news conference with real questions.</blockquote>
Campbell Brown, CNN, September 23, 2008

Gillian Parrillo
SacWomen]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Ladies&apos; Man</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/2008/09/ladies_man.html" />
   <id>tag:www.sacramentoexecutive.com,2008:/sacwomen//4.1543</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-17T07:52:05Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-17T07:53:13Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The New Republic Ladies&apos; Man by Fred Strebeigh The backslapping, bloviating hero of women&apos;s rights. Post Date Wednesday, September 24, 2008 In January 2000, when the Supreme Court assembled to hear oral arguments attacking a pivotal section of the Violence...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Gillian Parrillo</name>
      <uri>http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/index.xml</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Political" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/">
      <![CDATA[<blockquote>The New Republic

Ladies' Man
 by Fred Strebeigh
The backslapping, bloviating hero of women's rights.
Post Date Wednesday, September 24, 2008 
  
In January 2000, when the Supreme Court assembled to hear oral arguments attacking a pivotal section of the Violence Against Women Act, Joseph Biden was front and center. VAWA legally protects women from domestic abuse and gender-based violence, and Biden has proclaimed it the "most important legislative accomplishment" of his Senate career. But, long before the law had reached a congressional vote, Chief Justice William Rehnquist had attacked the "Civil Rights for Women" section, with which Biden sought to define gender-motivated crimes as bias or hate crimes.

As Rehnquist prepared to open the morning's first argument, Biden did not sit somberly. Rather, the senator swiveled in his seat (conspicuous to most of us in the court's press section), smiling cheerily and talking with nearby allies, including numerous female attorneys who had helped him shape the bill. Although Biden had no official role, he sought to signal that--in what he described that day as a "titanic struggle"--neither he nor the women around him would go quietly in defeat.

These days, many women voters are more likely to perceive Biden as a spoiler than as a supporter. Since his selection last month as Barack Obama's running mate, Biden has been pitted against women, first taking the job that many Hillary Clinton supporters felt was her due, then facing off against another historic woman, Sarah Palin, who could become the first female vice president of the United States. With his 30-plus years in the Senate, Biden can sound like the member of a male-only club, an impression reinforced by old-boy gaffes--from joking that his wife's doctorate "is a problem" to referring to Palin as "good-looking."

But the irony of this assessment is that Biden has some of the best feminist bona fides around. The mostly untold story of Biden's fight to support the "Civil Rights For Women" section of VAWA provides a window into his work for women, its origins, and how the defense of women's rights fits into his political worldview. Women voters may yet find something to cheer: In fighting for the legislation, Biden showed he was willing to trust the guidance of women activists and women judges, and then to contend against fierce and mostly male resistance in Washington, particularly from the Supreme Court.</blockquote> 

Gillian Parrillo
SacWomen

 
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Erica Jong: Dear John Letter</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/2008/09/eirc_jong_dear_john_letter.html" />
   <id>tag:www.sacramentoexecutive.com,2008:/sacwomen//4.1542</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-16T03:56:52Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-16T13:58:57Z</updated>
   
   <summary>We&apos;re not that stupid. Sure it would be nice if the women of America believed that everyone with breasts and a vagina believed in equality. But it ain&apos;t so. Women have differing views -- just like men. Some like beer;...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Gillian Parrillo</name>
      <uri>http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/index.xml</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Political" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/">
      <![CDATA[<blockquote>We're not that stupid. Sure it would be nice if the women of America believed that everyone with breasts and a vagina believed in equality. But it ain't so. Women have differing views -- just like men.

Some like beer; some like chardonnay. And some prefer AA. Some like automatic weapons; some don't. Some think every pregnancy is sanctified; some don't. Some think presidents should be qualified for office; some don't care.

But to take the struggle for equal rights that has gone on for two centuries and embody it in the person of Sarah Palin is not just misleading but abusive. Charging rape victims for rape kits is a travesty of equal rights. Insisting that government impose your own views of abortion on others is anti-equality. Cutting funding for black teenage mothers is anti-feminist and racist. Lying to the electorate about your record is insolent. Do you think we're too stupid or indolent to check?

We have checked. You are lying and so is she. But you must think that a big lie repeated over and over becomes the truth. And it seems that many Americans are with you on that. 

You are so good at the bold-faced lie that you even seem to believe it yourself. When Barbara Walters and Joy Behar accused you of lying on "The View," you claimed you weren't.

I guess your handlers have decided that after eight years of Cheney-Bush saying one thing and doing another, truth no longer has any meaning. Say it often enough and we'll believe anything -- like the good commercial-watchers we are. So, prep Sarah to sound like Hillary -- and we'll be fooled.

It remains to be seen how many will.

But one thing is clear. You have reached a new low in your regard for the public. You have blown your credibility. Usually politicians wait to be elected to do that.

It's fascinating to watch you and your party try to co-opt the idea of change, the idea of equal rights after eight years of being in total control and trashing the country for women, for workers, for taxpayers and for anyone who earns dollars.

Do you really think we're that stupid? Apparently you do.

Tax cuts for the rich have produced trickle-down unemployment. You want to try that again? We don't. The private sector has not policed itself. Failing banks and mortgage companies prove that. The deficit has swelled. Insurance rates for health care have swelled. Women are joining the ranks of the poor faster than ever. 

Play it again, John?

As Sarah Palin said, lying about her lust for earmarks, "Thanks but no thanks."

Sincerely,
Erica Jong</blockquote>

Gillian Parrillo
SacWomen]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>50+ Middle Class Women 4 Obama</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/2008/09/50_middle_class_women_4_obama.html" />
   <id>tag:www.sacramentoexecutive.com,2008:/sacwomen//4.1540</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-13T15:45:05Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-13T15:46:17Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Congrats to all of you for your measured reasoning in voting for Obama. Gillian Parrillo SacWomen...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Gillian Parrillo</name>
      <uri>http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/index.xml</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sacramentoexecutive.com/sacwomen/">
      <![CDATA[<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XqsvAf2FR0Y&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XqsvAf2FR0Y&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Congrats to all of you for your measured reasoning in voting for Obama.

Gillian Parrillo
SacWomen]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
